PDA

View Full Version : Vietnamese blogs must be regulated


bschuess
12-27-2007, 07:01 AM
This article adds some interesting information to the discussions we have had about VIEX content.



Vietnam must regulate blogs, say officials

Weblogs have exploded in Vietnam in recent years, especially among youths, providing a forum for chatting about mostly societal and lifestyle issues and providing an alternative to the state-controlled media.
Recent anti-Chinese protests over the disputed Spratly and Paracel islands, which were halted following rebukes from Beijing, were organized and debated on the Internet but almost completely ignored by the official press.
The ministry responsible for culture and information, which controls traditional media, in July said it was drafting regulations that would fine bloggers who post subversive and sexually explicit content online.
Deputy Information and Communications Minister Do Quy Doan this week told a conference on Vietnam's press law that "controlling weblogs is about developing them in accordance with the law, not forbidding them.
"We should provide guidelines that help people know what type of information they can upload online," Doan said according to a report in the English-language Than Nien (Youth Daily) newspaper.
Bloggers would also be held responsible for information they access, he reportedly said, adding: "Once we have obvious regulations, I think no one will be able to supervise weblogs better than the bloggers themselves."
Nguyen The Ky, head of the press management and publishing bureau, said: "It's all right some bloggers have recently showed their patriotism, posting opinions about the Paracels-Spratly archipelagos on their weblogs."
"But some have sparked protest, causing public disorder and affecting the country's foreign affairs.
"It's impossible to control the Internet, so I think we should bolster technical security measures in addition to creating regulations."

Khatores
12-27-2007, 08:25 AM
Deputy Information and Communications Minister Do Quy Doan this week told a conference on Vietnam's press law that "controlling weblogs is about developing them in accordance with the law, not forbidding them.
"We should provide guidelines that help people know what type of information they can upload online," Doan said according to a report in the English-language Than Nien (Youth Daily) newspaper.
I'm curious about the philosophical origins of this type of close censorship and content regulation. When they tell citizens these things, how do they rationalize it logically? Who was it that decided this would be a good idea to begin with, and why did they think that?

Regulating the media closely seems like something that takes an incredible amount of time and effort, and is probably very expensive. The internet would be infinitely more trouble, because it's difficult to tell what comes from where. In the end, this seems like it would be a lot more trouble than it would actually be effective.

There must be some reason why they're continuing to do this when it consumes an incredible amount of effort.